MLS - April 24 - Toronto (Home)

[Gotham Gator]

PRO Referees stated that the call on the field is that Morales was offside, and there was not enough evidence to overrule on video. This seems correct to me.

They also had an angle the opposite from the one above. It was from the same sideline and slightly to the goal side of Bradley and Morales. This one suggested he was offside, although the angle makes it impossible to know for sure.

 

[SoupInNYC]

PRO Referees stated that the call on the field is that Morales was offside, and there was not enough evidence to overrule on video. This seems correct to me.

They also had an angle the opposite from the one above. It was from the same sideline and slightly to the goal side of Bradley and Morales. This one suggested he was offside, although the angle makes it impossible to know for sure.

They stated that the call on the field was offsides? It definitely wasn't clear that that was the original call.

 

[Gotham Gator]

Sorry - wasn't clear. The call on the field was that he was in an offside position. They didn't call that he had touched the ball.

So, when video showed that the ball had hit Morales and was not clear about whether he was offside, that was enough to overturn.

 

[SoupInNYC]

Sorry - wasn't clear. The call on the field was that he was in an offside position. They didn't call that he had touched the ball.

So, when video showed that the ball had hit Morales and was not clear about whether he was offside, that was enough to overturn.

Ahhhh, I see.

 

[Antidote P. Smiley]

Ahhhh, I see.

I don't remember there being an offsides call on the field at all. They celebrated and went back for the restart and then the CR went to the VAR monitor.

 

[LionNYC]

Here's the video. It's a bit confusing their wording at the very end of the NYC-TOR clip. They mention interference and offside...