And they both end with "ation". It would be unfair to treat them differently.Both start with c. I'm sold.
And they both end with "ation". It would be unfair to treat them differently.Both start with c. I'm sold.
In 2 or 3 years, it will be 24 teams and home and home in conference and 1 game OoC.One question I've had is why do we play 3rd games against 6 teams in our conference rather than 2nd games against 6 teams in the other conference? That would help even out everyone's schedule both within each conference and the league overall. I suppose the reason is to milk an extra game between rivals and to cut down on travel costs, but there would be practical benefits to more interconference games.
Full 30ish player rosters, including DPs.Very interesting, especially in light of mgarbowski 's analysis of win/loss between the conferences. East spending more. West winning more. Maybe everyone should spend less.
Clarification: Do those spending numbers cover cap spending only? Or do they include the above the cap DP spending/TAM/etc?
Nothing scientific here but traveling for work I always found it easier to work after traveling west. Of course I had more work at 7 AM and they work more at 7 PM.I wonder how much the time zone difference could play into the better performance of western conference teams. In other words, is it perhaps easier for western conference teams to come out east and play a couple of hours earlier than it is for eastern conference teams to go out west and play a couple of hours later? There's also the added factor of irregular match start times to accommodate TV schedules.
It's probably a bit of a stretch and difficult to decouple this from home field advantage except where home / away teams play in more similar time zones, but thought it was worth a mention.
I have a movie for you to watch that delves into this by a pompous Frenchman with a gun-toting & albino Milli Vanilli. Since youLet's go with that. Correlation and causation are virtually the same word.
Seen it; it was around then that I figured the next 1.5 movies were going to be, less than satisfying.I have a movie for you to watch that delves into this by a pompous Frenchman with a gun-toting & albino Milli Vanilli. Since youlikelove BSG, you've probably already seen it and are simply humoring Mr. Footy.
Be the Spoon.
It's the opposite in the NFL. West Coast teams typically struggle on trips east - that 1 pm EST kickoff feels like 10 am.I wonder how much the time zone difference could play into the better performance of western conference teams. In other words, is it perhaps easier for western conference teams to come out east and play a couple of hours earlier than it is for eastern conference teams to go out west and play a couple of hours later? There's also the added factor of irregular match start times to accommodate TV schedules.
It's probably a bit of a stretch and difficult to decouple this from home field advantage except where home / away teams play in more similar time zones, but thought it was worth a mention.
I think the West has just had better ownership the last decade.
Much of the West have fantastic, fully engaged ownership like Seattle, SKC, RSL, Portland, LA...
Meanwhile back East, we've had RB, the Krafts, various Chicago owners...just a lot of apathy and stupidity.
But the new Columbus owner is good, new Orlando owner is very ambitious, Toronto have shown more ambition, CFG look ready to splash the cash, Montreal has engaged ownership.
Onice Miami and Atlanta join, I think the East will own the league.
Yep. https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/nfl-west-coast-teams-traveling-east/it's 2016, not 1816 or 1916 when cross country travel was prohibitively expense and time consuming.
do teams in NFL (16 games), NBA (82 games), MLB (162 games) and NHL (82 games) have the same issues about travel and time zones?
The start time for games is a huge advantage for the West teams. A 7pm Pacific start is 10pm for east coast teams - that's tough to get the same performance out of a player's body when they're used to being finished with all activity by then.I'm not necessarily expecting a larger home field advantage for interconference play in MLS, and I would want to compare over a few seasons to make a judgment. It may or may not exist. But the regular home field performance is certainly real, and I think is responsible for some but certainly not all of the West's advantage so far this year.
Believe MLS teams are only allowed four charters per year. Presumably they use them from the cross country flights, but a lot of commercial travel in MLS.Trael should be easy these days most the clubs have private jets and there are plenty of training facilities to train in if you want to travel earlier. Teams in Europe play and different times all week and have no issues adjusting.
European teams very rarely have to fly more than 2-3 hours to get anywhere on the continent and there is rarely more than an hour time difference between cities. In the US there is a 3 hour time difference between east and west coast and fairly long commercial flight times between the two coasts as well. It's not nearly as easy as it is in Europe.Trael should be easy these days most the clubs have private jets and there are plenty of training facilities to train in if you want to travel earlier. Teams in Europe play and different times all week and have no issues adjusting.
I assume the Europe comment was more in reference to early stage Champion's League matches. The flight from Manchester to Moscow (or vice versa) is bound to be tough. But there are very few of those and the top teams in UCL are so much better than their far east competitors that the time zone issue is nearly irrelevant.European teams very rarely have to fly more than 2-3 hours to get anywhere on the continent and there is rarely more than an hour time difference between cities. In the US there is a 3 hour time difference between east and west coast and fairly long commercial flight times between the two coasts as well. It's not nearly as easy as it is in Europe.