Stadium Discussion

Where Do You Want The Stadium?

  • Manhattan

    Votes: 54 16.6%
  • Queens

    Votes: 99 30.5%
  • Brooklyn

    Votes: 19 5.8%
  • Staten Island

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • Westchester

    Votes: 18 5.5%
  • The Bronx

    Votes: 113 34.8%
  • Long Island

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • Dual-Boroughs

    Votes: 3 0.9%
  • Etihad Island

    Votes: 5 1.5%

  • Total voters
    325
Did anyone ever find out what Adams's position was on the stadium?

Dog help us if Wiley gets elected.
From the City.nyc poll in response to the following question:

The Bronx: Do you support building a stadium for the NYCFC soccer club next to Yankee Stadium?
  • Yes, I will do whatever I can to make this happen:
    • Yang, McGuire
  • Yes, but only if a deal can be reached with no public subsidy or tax breaks:
    • Stringer, Foldenauer, Sliwa, Donovan, Prince, Garcia, Chang, Taylor
  • No
    • Morales, Wiley
 
From the City.nyc poll in response to the following question:

The Bronx: Do you support building a stadium for the NYCFC soccer club next to Yankee Stadium?
  • Yes, I will do whatever I can to make this happen:
    • Yang, McGuire
  • Yes, but only if a deal can be reached with no public subsidy or tax breaks:
    • Stringer, Foldenauer, Sliwa, Donovan, Prince, Garcia, Chang, Taylor
  • No
    • Morales, Wiley
Notice what's missing?

Adams.
 
From the City.nyc poll in response to the following question:

The Bronx: Do you support building a stadium for the NYCFC soccer club next to Yankee Stadium?
  • Yes, I will do whatever I can to make this happen:
    • Yang, McGuire
  • Yes, but only if a deal can be reached with no public subsidy or tax breaks:
    • Stringer, Foldenauer, Sliwa, Donovan, Prince, Garcia, Chang, Taylor
  • No
    • Morales, Wiley
This is literally the only reference I could find to her having an opinion on a stadium -- a one-word answer to a question that was most certainly answered by a campaign worker. Given the amount of ancillary spending CFG would do surrounding a stadium, I find it difficult to believe that any Mayor would give a blanket no to a project with minimal public funding.

And please don't base your vote on a single issue that is of no significance to 99% of New Yorkers.
 
I will add for now that I was attending this meeting today with the anticipation of letting out some tweets around "that box has now been checked" and "onto the Bronx Borough Board vote". But an amended agenda was provided today (original agenda provided a week in advance) and the vote was removed. It ended up being a very interesting meeting. I noted on twitter and will also do so here, I'm probably going to unpack this into a larger post instead of firing off tweets. Still hoping to turn this around as quick as I can.
 
I will add for now that I was attending this meeting today with the anticipation of letting out some tweets around "that box has now been checked" and "onto the Bronx Borough Board vote". But an amended agenda was provided today (original agenda provided a week in advance) and the vote was removed. It ended up being a very interesting meeting. I noted on twitter and will also do so here, I'm probably going to unpack this into a larger post instead of firing off tweets. Still hoping to turn this around as quick as I can.

You deserve a Pulitzer.

Someone check the bond prices!
 
I will add for now that I was attending this meeting today with the anticipation of letting out some tweets around "that box has now been checked" and "onto the Bronx Borough Board vote". But an amended agenda was provided today (original agenda provided a week in advance) and the vote was removed. It ended up being a very interesting meeting. I noted on twitter and will also do so here, I'm probably going to unpack this into a larger post instead of firing off tweets. Still hoping to turn this around as quick as I can.

This is a tough pill to swallow. Things seemed to be finally progressing and it's back to 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Do you think this has anything to do with the mayoral election?
 
This is a tough pill to swallow. Things seemed to be finally progressing and it's back to 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Do you think this has anything to do with the mayoral election?
No, if anything they were looking to move this along quicker understanding that a new mayor and city council were on the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snugglefarts