Contract runs out in June. I don't know if Celta would cancel the loan, but I would imagine he is joining midway through the year. I'm in on this.
I think FIFA rules facilitate a transfer in those cases when there are 6 months left in a contract
Contract runs out in June. I don't know if Celta would cancel the loan, but I would imagine he is joining midway through the year. I'm in on this.
Definitely seems like a more nuanced idea than just using a caddy for Andrea. Without Iraola though, I would just prefer to get rid of Pirlo and play a normal 433.Do we need a CDM? We lost Lampard at CAM and Iraola at CDM. Why not try to pick up two high work rate box to box CMs to flank Pirlo with? Isn't that the more traditional 4-3-3 set up with Pirlo? Credit to PV for finding a way to make it work with the Iraola/Pirlo partnership but it was a bit awkward a times and you could argue teams figured out that if they pressed the back line and took both Iraola and Pirlo away we had no plan B.
Two CMs with reasonable defensive work rates and high positional IQ would give Pirlo two options to move the ball through the midfield. They can help cover when Mata goes forward, and it frees up our wings to attack and not worry so much about tracking back. Without needing as much defensive help from the wings Villa could slide to LW if we found a DP CF or we could sign an attack minded DP winger and not worry about defensive issues. If we find the right players it will essentially let us shift to a more natural 4-3-3 set up and we wont have to do all the cover up stuff we did this season like playing a CB at RB, having our LW and RW track way back on D, etc.
If true, then he has always/continued to snub Metro/RB..... which is so hilarious considering it's his home state.
I'd totally take the guy - can play forward and attacking mid.
Speaking of rosters...not sure if posted anywhere. Goal.com writer Thomas Floyd ranked and gave analysis on the top 10 in every position.
https://goo.gl/PnPzag
Interestingly, he ranks Pirlo as the #1 CM in the league. Other NYCFC players made the list.
I agree. I think the early season clearly showed that Pirlo as the deepest MF was a problem. We got shredded defensively in our first two road matches against Chicago and Columbus when PV was still running out the Pirlo-TMac-Mix midfield (that seems like a very long time ago). Things turned around when he started playing Bravo behind Pirlo later in April and then really picked up when it was Iraola at the end of May.while true...its just that this team loses the ball way too much for my liking and not everyone tracks back as quickly so we get exposed badly at times...that is why i wanted a CDM....i always like that position any way
Was very surprised that he ranked Brillant at CB. Not that I think Brillant is bad, but that I figured the number of goals we let in would mean none of our CBs would be ranked
Rossi makes about $1.8 Million currently. I guess you could fit him in as a non DP if he joins in July and are only responsible for $900k in wages? You could pay down the 900k to below the DP level and still have money for a DP.
Then Pirlo falls off in 2017 and his salary hits the full cap. That could theoretically work.
I've thought for months what they should do is this:
Wow. That would be some next level cap management.
I thought the rules spread out the salaries evenly over the years on the contract, no matter how the actual payments were structured?I've thought for months what they should do is this:
Step 1) Sign three DPs
Step 2) Make sure you spread out their salaries
- DP 1 has a 3 year contract
- DP 2 has a 3 year contract
- DP 3 has a 2 year contract
Step 3) Sign 2 or 3 more "DPs" using the same structure so you can have 3-6 "DPs" on the books.
- Contract for DP 1 & 2
- Year 1 250k
- Year 2 250k
- Year 3 $14.5 mil
- What you've essentially done is back loaded their contract so they're not technically DPs in the first two years.
- Contract for DP 3
- Year 1 250k
- Year 2 $9.5 mil
Yes it flaunts the spirit of the rules but the rules are stupid.
Correct. ACole was the first player to loophole that mechanism of spreading it out and backending it after one year (of achieved milestones)I thought the rules spread out the salaries evenly over the years on the contract, no matter how the actual payments were structured?
Correct. ACole was the first player to loophole that mechanism of spreading it out and backending it after one year (of achieved milestones)
Fair enough, I'm just always trying to find the easy way to do something.Actually, that was de Jong. The DP portion of his contract was conditional and not guaranteed, so it didn't get brought forward into the first year. Worth noting that he never did get the DP portion.
There's not really a way to game the system the way NYCFCfan suggests. LA had a one off situation, and they didn't end up keeping the player. You have to think the next guy offered a de Jong type deal is going to be very wary given how it played out for him.
Fair enough, I'm just always trying to find the easy way to do something.
As many as we want. We only limit the number of Diners Club players.How many visa players are we allowed?
As many as we want. We only limit the number of Diners Club players.