Yes. Not post match appropriate.That's gonna take some studying.
Yes. Not post match appropriate.That's gonna take some studying.
On the other hand, we demolished Dallas and then they picked themselves up and have reversed what SKC has been doing so if Dallas keep performing, it should rise to counteract SKC's slump, no?That's gonna take some studying.
One oddity about the latest 538 update. As expected, NYCFC's numbers all improve after beating the Red Bulls, except the SPI score went down, slightly, from 41.5 to 41.4 All I can figure is our most impressive win this year (by numbers/ranking type measures) was away at SKC and they lost twice this week so our strength of wins went down. Probably a couple of other similar results thrown in.
NYCFC's SPI per 538 has gone up by 3.4 points since pre-season. I was just addressing the drop this week, which seems an anomaly since NYC beat one of the two teams ranked higher than it. Dallas did have a nice win over top ranked Atlanta, but also lost to RSL this week, so I guess that didn't help much, and not enough to offset SKC losing twice.On the other hand, we demolished Dallas and then they picked themselves up and have reversed what SKC has been doing so if Dallas keep performing, it should rise to counteract SKC's slump, no?
Personally the whole SPI thing confuses me a lot, so I choose to ignore it (also, because it never seems very accurate at all...)NYCFC's SPI per 538 has gone up by 3.4 points since pre-season. I was just addressing the drop this week, which seems an anomaly since NYC beat one of the two teams ranked higher than it. Dallas did have a nice win over top ranked Atlanta, but also lost to RSL this week, so I guess that didn't help much, and not enough to offset SKC losing twice.
RSL is the second best home side in the league, only trailing us on avg pts/game. They’re legit tough because of their altitude variable - is that where Dallas lost to them?NYCFC's SPI per 538 has gone up by 3.4 points since pre-season. I was just addressing the drop this week, which seems an anomaly since NYC beat one of the two teams ranked higher than it. Dallas did have a nice win over top ranked Atlanta, but also lost to RSL this week, so I guess that didn't help much, and not enough to offset SKC losing twice.
- If David Villa plays every minute from now to the end of the season it will be still less than last year and average 69 minutes per game
Somewhere Kreis is having coffee and praying we go on a 16 game losing streak.....With a win on Wednesday, we will have reached our point total from the 2015 season (37).
Which, to him, is not so crazy to imagine. He had some super bad streaks in Disney.Somewhere Kreis is having coffee and praying we go on a 16 game losing streak.....
Yes. Definitely not a shameful loss for Dallas, who also played at Minnesota, Home to Atlanta, and then at RSL in the space of 8 days.RSL is the second best home side in the league, only trailing us on avg pts/game. They’re legit tough because of their altitude variable - is that where Dallas lost to them?
Except you forgot to put in a major variable: Dome coming in. We still don't have a definitive answer as to what kind of stability he brings, and the fact that he came in at the exact half-way point just means that we should have more instability ppg-wise, no? unless I'm doing that wrong.Worth noting that we are now reaching the point in the season where our PPG stabilizes and we begin to know where we can expect to finish point wise. It happens around the mid-point of the season each year, as seen in the second chart above. In 2016, we hit our final PPG after Game 16; last year it was after Game 18; 2015 is not on the chart, but the trend was the same, hitting final PPG after Games 16 and 18 and not fluctuating too much.
I think this is probably true of the large majority of MLS teams each season, save for a few notable exceptions such as Seattle two years ago. Absent something compelling (big summer signing, injuries, etc.), you are what you are after half the season is played.
I think this means we are likely (but not certainly) going to end up behind Atlanta and battling NJ for 2nd in the East and Dallas and LAFC for 2nd overall.
Except you forgot to put in a major variable: Dome coming in. We still don't have a definitive answer as to what kind of stability he brings, and the fact that he came in at the exact half-way point just means that we should have more instability ppg-wise, no? unless I'm doing that wrong.
My happy-thought optimism rationale would be that we reverse the team's away failures and even win 4-5 games. That would leave us with a not unreasonable 6-7 away wins for the year. Win 6 of 8 at home, and 4 or 5 on the road, and the PPG climbs up to the 2.00+ range and has us challenging Atlanta.Worth noting that we are now reaching the point in the season where our PPG stabilizes and we begin to know where we can expect to finish point wise. It happens around the mid-point of the season each year, as seen in the second chart above. In 2016, we hit our final PPG after Game 16; last year it was after Game 18; 2015 is not on the chart, but the trend was the same, hitting final PPG after Games 16 and 18 and not fluctuating too much.
I think this is probably true of the large majority of MLS teams each season, save for a few notable exceptions such as Seattle two years ago. Absent something compelling (big summer signing, injuries, etc.), you are what you are after half the season is played.
I think this means we are likely (but not certainly) going to end up behind Atlanta and battling NJ for 2nd in the East and Dallas and LAFC for 2nd overall.
I think this means we are likely (but not certainly) going to end up behind Atlanta and battling NJ for 2nd in the East and Dallas and LAFC for 2nd overall.
I follow you on the data for sure but we aren't really behind. We have 2 games in hand and another head to head with RBNJ.