Lampard isn't our player. We fans didnt know it, but he has always been under contract with MCFC and the contract was extended until the end of the MCFC season. If he plays for us before then it will be on loan.
Mcfc Confirms Lampard Staying In Manchester For The Season
- Thread starter NYCFCFan10
- Start date
i feel you man, my post was saying i don't agree with how the the owners of the clubs handle things.
You realize Lampard was literally never our guy, it was a straight up lie.
And if you're angry about Villa, how can you not understand our anger with Lampard?
We were lied to and it looks like it was designed to be a lie from the beginning. They stole our guy, which forced us to take back Villa because someone has to promote our club.
Face it, Manchester is the problem.
If Frank didn't think he could still compete at the highest level he should have retired at the end of last season. There was never a question about his ability to play in the PL this season and not the MLS if that is what he wanted to do.
Theres a bit of a difference between our situations though, we had a player who half of our season was planned around was taken away 4 games in compared to a player who merely hasn't arrived to play for a club that isn't even in season yet. CFG are a big part of the problem but it cant be all blamed on them.
he knew he could compete but Chelsea didn't offer him a new contract.
Personally Frankie looks like he's ready for a couple more years the way he's going. I applaud his play out there, i hope the 2 DP spots on our side get filled sooner than later though
Dude, we've calculated that Lampard will miss 11 games at least if he stays til the end at Manchester. That's if he doesn't rest at all -- which you know he will.
Lampard himself is on record about the importance of him being here for training camp and bonding with the guys. He's on massive billboards saying "Buy your season tickets now!"
It doesn't matter quality of the leagues or what he wants, deals were made, promises were made and he and Manchester are going back on them now that its convenient.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/30647043 I believe this BBC report that he has always been contracted to MCFC and that the contract was extended to the end of the MCFC 2014-2015 season.
Its funny you literally don't even know what you're talking about but still have the audacity to come here and say we are acting like "spoilt" brats (chip, chip, cheerio)
Meanwhile you rant about a half kept Villa loan spell. My mind is blowing.
im just saying thats how it comes across because you and your club has been looked after so well by CFG whereas we have been left out in the cold.
Ok, I get that but I definitely think we've both been left out now.
Even though Manchester said it wasn't the case, its brutally obvious that there is a pecking order here and that's unfortunate.
agreed the pecking order sucks but just remember that even now you are above us still! haha. They have their own agenda which is to spread their brand, all I will say is you guys are lucky you haven't had to go through the destruction of the club you love to build a new version
cfg is a business so they go for the money, im sure if NYCFC underperforms, not in the league, but in revenue, they won't care much. not saying Melbourne doesn't, idk that situation too well. im just going by what i see.
the rumours we heard down here was that the coaching staff and everyone in the club wanted him back to "promote" and to protect them from potentially losing another player.
we are all agree there, football in both melbourne and new york are probably going to struggle to make a big profit either way its more so just about getting more manchester fans in both cities because thats where the money is
Man city can go f themselves. I will cheer for every EPL team that plays man city.
And for all you blue moon f**ks, if it wasn't for us, you all would be speaking German you p*ssys.
And for all you blue moon f**ks, if it wasn't for us, you all would be speaking German you p*ssys.
Similar threads
