Alex Da Silva
Registered
20 years from now mix and Matt [Dunn] will be playing a pickup game in the park. I wonder if they are still friends...?
Yeah, take Kompany out of the lineup and MCFC may have a worse (league-wise) defense than NYCFC - just a better (which is debatable) Keeper.The Guardian asks: Have NYCFC Finally Learned 'the City way'?
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/mar/18/mls-weekend-previews-new-york-city-fc
("Finally" seems a weird choice of words given how long our team has existed, but whatevs)
If the ‘City way’ is to be drawn from what Man City have been over the past two seasons or so, NYC FC are pretty close to the mark in 2016 – razor sharp in attack, decidedly sluggish at the back. Six goals from their opening two games of the season suggests Vieira’s side have quickly found their attacking groove, but that has been somewhat offset by the five goals they have conceded in the process.
With Kompany they give up 0.65 goals per game. Without him it's 1.53. Record with 11W-3D-3L, without 8W-3D-8L.Yeah, take Kompany out of the lineup and MCFC may have a worse (league-wise) defense than NYCFC - just a better (which is debatable) Keeper.
You feel that Joe Hart is only "debatably" better than Saunders?just a better (which is debatable) Keeper.
Compared within each league, yeah. Saunders is not a top keeper in MLS and Hart is not a top keeper in the EPL. Hart may have a great win/loss record, but that's not because he keeps MCFC in games, it's because his field players score a ton. Hart routinely gives up head-scratchers.You feel that Joe Hart is only "debatably" better than Saunders?
You guys all know that Hart is not just the Man City keeper but he's also the keeper for England, right?Compared within each league, yeah. Saunders is not a top keeper in MLS and Hart is not a top keeper in the EPL. Hart may have a great win/loss record, but that's not because he keeps MCFC in games, it's because his field players score a ton. Hart routinely gives up head-scratchers.
That doesn't mean England has a good keeper. It means he was an English kid that wasn't good with his feet.You guys all know that Hart is not just the Man City keeper but he's also the keeper for England, right?
Compared within each league, yeah. Saunders is not a top keeper in MLS and Hart is not a top keeper in the EPL. Hart may have a great win/loss record, but that's not because he keeps MCFC in games, it's because his field players score a ton. Hart routinely gives up head-scratchers.
Way off base on Hart.Compared within each league, yeah. Saunders is not a top keeper in MLS and Hart is not a top keeper in the EPL. Hart may have a great win/loss record, but that's not because he keeps MCFC in games, it's because his field players score a ton. Hart routinely gives up head-scratchers.
Way off base on Hart.
"...the best seats in the house are in the right-field bleachers and a boisterous crowd of millennials never stops chanting"
Compared within each league, yeah. Saunders is not a top keeper in MLS and Hart is not a top keeper in the EPL. Hart may have a great win/loss record, but that's not because he keeps MCFC in games, it's because his field players score a ton. Hart routinely gives up head-scratchers.
No pretty sure he was benched for pantilimon for a few weeks precisely because because he gave up some real bone headed goals.Way off base on Hart.
He also said it seemed like there was nobody over 50."...the best seats in the house are in the right-field bleachers and a boisterous crowd of millennials never stops chanting"
What?
Klapisch has covered the Yankees for both the Daily News and Post. I presume he lost his position since both have cut back on veteran sportswriters to save money. He filled a hole (good for him) at that publication because there are lots of Yankee fans in north Jersey. I also bet he took a pay cut but regular work is better than none. And I also laughed at the RB comments. The whole point of the article was that a baseball writer/fan who covers the Yankees went to try something unfamiliar to him at the place he usually covers Yankee baseball.lol at the RB fans comments wanting him to go to harrison.
interesting take, i find it more interesting it was a jersey site though.
Lol, I stopped reading after the first paragraph.He also said it seemed like there was nobody over 50.
I don't know if I should feel flattered or ignored.
He also said it seemed like there was nobody over 50.
I don't know if I should feel flattered or ignored.
Klapisch has covered the Yankees for both the Daily News and Post. I presume he lost his position since both have cut back on veteran sportswriters to save money. He filled a hole (good for him) at that publication because there are lots of Yankee fans in north Jersey. I also bet he took a pay cut but regular work is better than none. And I also laughed at the RB comments. The whole point of the article was that a baseball writer/fan who covers the Yankees went to try something unfamiliar to him at the place he usually covers Yankee baseball.
This is actually a really nice article. Not sure where all the shade is coming from. Sure, it's from the perspective of a non-soccer fan, but it's very complimentary of the sport. It talks about how MLS is growing, praises the energetic atmosphere the fans create and said that Tex was wrong when he was worried the sports couldn't co-habitate in the House that Ruth Built. It also stated that the Yankees own 20% of the club, and I'm not sure we had seen that figure posted elsewhere.
And while he said that it seemed there was nobody over 50, this freshly minted 50-year-old didn't take offense (for one thing, I wasn't there).