Zlatan wants to trade Zlatan.Galaxy want to trade Zlatan
Zlatan wants to trade Zlatan.Galaxy want to trade Zlatan
Galaxy want to trade Zlatan
Zlatan wants to trade Galaxy.
Always thought he looked better on the left wing myself.
So, according to The Atlantic, MLS is about to give teams $3mil over 4 years for U20 international players.
https://theathletic.com/359370/2018...oney-to-purchase-young-international-players/
So, according to The Atlantic, MLS is about to give teams $3mil over 4 years for U20 international players.
https://theathletic.com/359370/2018...oney-to-purchase-young-international-players/
MLS needs more international spots first.
So we can we use Young Player Allocation Money retroactively on Medina? When will the YAM be announced?
Just to be clear, is this money from the league that is to be used by clubs, or a rule that allows clubs to use their own money in a new way?I broke down and subscribed, it's a good article with lots of details.
The answer to your question is no, but it doesn't matter much for Medina: "While the fund cannot be used on players already in MLS, a source indicated teams with eligible players already on loan will be able to use the fund to sign those players to a permanent deal. ... Players signed under the Youth Transfer Fund would hit teams’ budgets at the same rate as young Designated Players—either $150,000 or $200,000 depending on age. The Youth Transfer Fund would encompass both transfer fees and salary expenditure above that youth DP charge."
Sounds like YAM will go into effect in the summer transfer window.
Just to be clear, is this money from the league that is to be used by clubs, or a rule that allows clubs to use their own money in a new way?
I broke down and subscribed, it's a good article with lots of details.
The answer to your question is no, but it doesn't matter much for Medina: "While the fund cannot be used on players already in MLS, a source indicated teams with eligible players already on loan will be able to use the fund to sign those players to a permanent deal. ... Players signed under the Youth Transfer Fund would hit teams’ budgets at the same rate as young Designated Players—either $150,000 or $200,000 depending on age. The Youth Transfer Fund would encompass both transfer fees and salary expenditure above that youth DP charge."
Call me a commie but I don't like this being discretionary. I want all teams involved in this."The Youth Transfer Fund money is discretionary, multiple sources said, which means team owners will have to opt in to use all or some of the $3 million."
Oh cool I get an Amazon credit if y'all subscribe for the low, low price of $3/mo. at this link:
https://theathletic.com/359370?shared_by=316365
Call me a commie but I don't like this being discretionary. I want all teams involved in this.
Yep. Drop all discretionary & youth/senior descriptions, and simply slap a luxury tax on teams that are over a cap threshold. Done.Commie.
Honestly, though, MLS is making its own elaborate roster rules more and more farcical. The amount of discretionary money available to teams by this summer will be more than the supposed salary cap, and thanks to DP spending the payroll gap is already at European levels of disparity. At what point do you drop the act and just let teams buy who they want?
They're basically maintaining a cap on the salaries of average domestic talent while allowing almost all other spending to go unchecked, and they're using byzantine rules to modestly disguise this.Commie.
Honestly, though, MLS is making its own elaborate roster rules more and more farcical. The amount of discretionary money available to teams by this summer will be more than the supposed salary cap, and thanks to DP spending the payroll gap is already at European levels of disparity. At what point do you drop the act and just let teams buy who they want?
They're basically maintaining a cap on the salaries of average domestic talent while allowing almost all other spending to go unchecked, and they're using byzantine rules to modestly disguise this.