Ha, I was thinking the very same thing. Also, I could talk about spreadsheet formatting all day.It is so completely impossible for me to explain to my loved ones how very, very much psychological and intellectual value I get from this forum.
Ha, I was thinking the very same thing. Also, I could talk about spreadsheet formatting all day.It is so completely impossible for me to explain to my loved ones how very, very much psychological and intellectual value I get from this forum.
Spreadsheet formatting? Don't talk dirty to me like that you slut.Ha, I was thinking the very same thing. Also, I could talk about spreadsheet formatting all day.
Ha, I was thinking the very same thing. Also, I could talk about spreadsheet formatting all day.
I kind of like that. It could come in to play but is low enough that it is below the more meaningful factors.One interesting thing to note is how tiebreakers are decided for conference standings:
1.Total number of wins
2.Goal Differential (GD)
3.Goals For (GF)
4.Fewest Disciplinary Points*
5.Away Goals Differential
6.Away Goal For
7.Home Goals Differential
8.Home Goal For
9.Coin Toss (tie of 2 clubs) or Drawing of Lots (tie of 3 or more clubs)
After wins, then goal differential, then goals for, MLS decides tiebreakers about how clean and nice you play the game...
Good stuff. If we get at least 8 points, will you change your tagline (though it was the perfect summary of the season as of the end of the Montreal draw)? At some point this season will actually have become fun!What Do We Need/Want From 4 Games At Home
I don't there is a definitive, objectively correct answer to this, but here are some numbers-based thoughts.
The obvious lesson nobody really needs is that you can easily squander all the good work and results of a winning streak fast. This year, our excellent road record won't help us if we don't start also acquiring points at home.
- Our current PPG at home is 1.167 and this cannot stand if NYCFC is to be a playoff team.
- After this home stand we will have only 7 remaining Home games and 11 Away.
- Last year we had two 3-game winning streaks: Philly/Montreal/Toronto in June (this excludes the Open Cup loss focused only on league play) and Toronto/San Jose/Vancouver in September.
- We followed the first 3-game streak with 7 points in the next 5, and 4 in the 5 games after that.
- We followed the second 3-game streak by closing the season with 3 straight losses.
My bottom line is for NYCFC to get 8 points from this 4-game Home stand. I can grudgingly accept 7 as barely adequate. 6 points is not catastrophic given our position and the current East table, but it is bad given our current form. In fact, given our current form, we should get more than 8. But 8 is fine.
The combined Away record of our next 4 opponents is 3 Wins 14 Losses and 5 Ties. That is 0.636 PPG. One of the 3 wins is already against us in that depressing Orlando game. There is no reason for us to add to that total (although I would gladly take 3 Wins 1 Loss and 9 Points). These are horrible road teams to date.
If we get 8 points in the next 4 games the team's Home PPG jumps to 1.50 for the season which is close to where it should be and still below the Away PPG of 1.667. The PPG overall would be 1.5625 which projects to 53 points for the season.
I believe hoping for more than 8 is realistic. Winning 3 with either a tie or loss is not even slightly ridiculous. Winning all 4 at home would not be a shock. But 8 is I think the bottom line to be happy, with no tinge of disappointment.
mmmmmm, pivot tables . . .Spreadsheet formatting? Don't talk dirty to me like that you slut.
I definitely need a new signature line. It's no longer true. I just need to come up with the replacement.Good stuff. If we get at least 8 points, will you change your tagline (though it was the perfect summary of the season as of the end of the Montreal draw)? At some point this season will actually have become fun!
The combined Away record of our next 4 opponents is 3 Wins 14 Losses and 5 Ties. That is 0.636 PPG. One of the 3 wins is already against us in that depressing Orlando game. There is no reason for us to add to that total (although I would gladly take 3 Wins 1 Loss and 9 Points). These are horrible road teams to date.
I have a theory on our current away games. We took everybody along for the obvious reason of wanting everybody available to play, but I think there's a more important side to it. This was a week-long (maybe shorter) trip where everybody was sequestered together and had a chance to develop a family atmosphere. Most weeks the players congregate at training and then go their separate ways, but on a road trip, they're all experiencing the same stuff, in this case hotels, per diem, and a chartered flight. This is second nature to the starters on road trips, but to the developmental guys that never make the 18, or only do so at home, this is a big deal and probably helped to foster a positive atmosphere. And for guys that don't get a lot of playing time, these little perks are big and not only shows what they can aspire to with more training but also reinforces that their roles are meaningful. I really think the mindset has changed as of 5 games ago where they look more like a club doing what they can when they get the chance.8 or 9 points is needed in order to "balance" out the early struggles at home. 8 points would mean 2-0-2 from the homestand, 9 would be 3-1-0.
Anything less would be a disaster and means that NYCFC needs a historically good road record the rest of the way to make the playoffs. Give the team credit for pulling themselves up after the bad start (7 pts on the past road trip is fantastic and the team should be applauded) but doesn't mean a thing unless they can take care of business at home.
Should be noted that most of the MLS talking heads were gushing uncontrollably about how Toronto got 11 points out of their first 8 away games ("historic achievement" was even used). NYCFC has 10 pts out of 6 road games.
One interesting thing to note is how tiebreakers are decided for conference standings:
1.Total number of wins
2.Goal Differential (GD)
3.Goals For (GF)
4.Fewest Disciplinary Points*
5.Away Goals Differential
6.Away Goal For
7.Home Goals Differential
8.Home Goal For
9.Coin Toss (tie of 2 clubs) or Drawing of Lots (tie of 3 or more clubs)
After wins, then goal differential, then goals for, MLS decides tiebreakers about how clean and nice you play the game...
I'm actually fairly sanguine now after this road trip, although it's going to take a bit more sustained performance to make me truly confident.I expect mgarbowski to be revamping his numbers every week and being less of a (thoughtful) curmudgeon with their chances.
I'm torn between two thoughts:Are they the actual rules? What scenario were they thinking of where two clubs had an identical goal difference and away goal difference, but somehow conspired to have a different home GD? Or for that matter, how do you have an equal total goals for and away GF, but different for home?
I have a theory on our current away games. We took everybody along for the obvious reason of wanting everybody available to play, but I think there's a more important side to it. This was a week-long (maybe shorter) trip where everybody was sequestered together and had a chance to develop a family atmosphere. Most weeks the players congregate at training and then go their separate ways, but on a road trip, they're all experiencing the same stuff, in this case hotels, per diem, and a chartered flight. This is second nature to the starters on road trips, but to the developmental guys that never make the 18, or only do so at home, this is a big deal and probably helped to foster a positive atmosphere. And for guys that don't get a lot of playing time, these little perks are big and not only shows what they can aspire to with more training but also reinforces that their roles are meaningful. I really think the mindset has changed as of 5 games ago where they look more like a club doing what they can when they get the chance.
I expect mgarbowski to be revamping his numbers every week and being less of a (thoughtful) curmudgeon with their chances.