Guy was making TAM money and didnt play over 1000 minutes 2 out of his 4 years. 50k+600k in allocation dollars/cap room. This is a great move cap wise.
i don’t have an issue losing someone it’s more losing him and getting a small compensation and Charlotte getting much more. Losing him to Charlotte was expected but not charlotte getting 400k out of it.
At this rate it is what it is as you say.
If Charlotte drafted Medina then sold him to Brazil or Europe the same day, I think the reaction to his departure would be different. He was an underperforming DP and the club chose to let him go.Jesus Medina 4 years 23 goals, 15 Assists, 6482 minutes
Ismael Tajouri-Shradi 4 years 26 goals 9 Assists, 4390 Minutes
Shradi's offensive production per minute is much higher, but he was never available enough to get more minutes than he did. In the end, offensively, they were close to the same player in raw production. Both were streaky. In 2021, both scored at a solid rate in the early part of this season when we had no offensive depth, then had much weaker second halves: 2 goals for Medina and 0 for Shradi.
The difference is after a lot of DNP time mostly under Torrent, Medina improved where he could - his fitness and work rate - and in the cup-winning season contributed regularly enough in other ways that he appeared in more games than any other NYCFC player. The first secret of success is showing up. Isi couldn't do that. He was hurt and missed the last 7 games of the season when the team finally turned itself around. It wasn't his fault, but it is what it was. I think it's crazy that the general consensus is good-riddance to Medina and losing Shradi is a tragedy. Both contributed, both were flawed.
I think you have to unfortunately look at the big number too, $$$. Medina was making DP money, Isi was making TAM money. The expectations were always higher on Medina. And I think history just treated Medina poorly and gave Isi an edge. Medina came in lauded as the next Jack Harrison and right after Jack left and when Medina came in he… wasn’t. Isi’s first three shots in general for this team were actual goals. I think those events really set the bar for everyone’s expectations. Obviously perspectives change a little over time but first impressions and expectations vs. reality dragged Medina down and dragged Isi up.Jesus Medina 4 years 23 goals, 15 Assists, 6482 minutes
Ismael Tajouri-Shradi 4 years 26 goals 9 Assists, 4390 Minutes
Shradi's offensive production per minute is much higher, but he was never available enough to get more minutes than he did. In the end, offensively, they were close to the same player in raw production. Both were streaky. In 2021, both scored at a solid rate in the early part of this season when we had no offensive depth, then had much weaker second halves: 2 goals for Medina and 0 for Shradi.
The difference is after a lot of DNP time mostly under Torrent, Medina improved where he could - his fitness and work rate - and in the cup-winning season contributed regularly enough in other ways that he appeared in more games than any other NYCFC player. The first secret of success is showing up. Isi couldn't do that. He was hurt and missed the last 7 games of the season when the team finally turned itself around. It wasn't his fault, but it is what it was. I think it's crazy that the general consensus is good-riddance to Medina and losing Shradi is a tragedy. Both contributed, both were flawed.
Love the psychology of this.I think it's crazy that the general consensus is good-riddance to Medina and losing Shradi is a tragedy.
Medina definitely had DP expectation which he never met. And it was even worse. We decided that he was supposed to be our Almiron - a young South American who comes in and sets things on fire. He never did, not even close. But after 4 years I have to put that behind me. Ranking team DPs, in terms of all-in long term contribution to the team on the field, I'd put him behind behind only Villa and Maxi, and ahead of Pirlo, Lampard, and Mitrita, with Talles TBD. That says more about the club's DP failures than anything else, and again, a lot of Medina's placement here is just showing up.I think you have to unfortunately look at the big number too, $$$. Medina was making DP money, Isi was making TAM money. The expectations were always higher on Medina. And I think history just treated Medina poorly and gave Isi an edge. Medina came in lauded as the next Jack Harrison and right after Jack left and when Medina came in he… wasn’t. Isi’s first three shots in general for this team were actual goals. I think those events really set the bar for everyone’s expectations. Obviously perspectives change a little over time but first impressions and expectations vs. reality dragged Medina down and dragged Isi up.
I think another component of this effect that you have really touched upon a lot this season (especially with regards to the Ronny out crowd) is the forum’s tendencies towards hive mind. I think when you hear a bunch of people parrot the same ideas it creates a confirmation bias. K Kjbert and mgarbowski I think were definitely two members trying to talk up counter points to the hive mind at times this season with obvious frustrations.Medina definitely had DP expectation which he never met. And it was even worse. We decided that he was supposed to be our Almiron - a young South American who comes in and sets things on fire. He never did, not even close. But after 4 years I have to put that behind me. Ranking team DPs, in terms of all-in long term contribution to the team on the field, I'd put him behind behind only Villa and Maxi, and ahead of Pirlo, Lampard, and Mitrita, with Talles TBD. That says more about the club's DP failures than anything else, and again, a lot of Medina's placement here is just showing up.
Meanwhile, I've always been kind of fascinated about how the fans have never recalibrated on Shradi. They treat him as if he was always the guy who scored 11 goals in 18 appearances in 2018, but he never again really came close to doing that again, whether in terms of raw numbers, or efficiency, or anything.
ETA: just saw that while I was drafting this FootyLovin posted on a very similar theme. He's right, so much of this is just weird brain stuff.
Jesus Medina 4 years 23 goals, 15 Assists, 6482 minutes
Ismael Tajouri-Shradi 4 years 26 goals 9 Assists, 4390 Minutes
Shradi's offensive production per minute is much higher, but he was never available enough to get more minutes than he did. In the end, offensively, they were close to the same player in raw production. Both were streaky. In 2021, both scored at a solid rate in the early part of this season when we had no offensive depth, then had much weaker second halves: 2 goals for Medina and 0 for Shradi.
The difference is after a lot of DNP time mostly under Torrent, Medina improved where he could - his fitness and work rate - and in the cup-winning season contributed regularly enough in other ways that he appeared in more games than any other NYCFC player. The first secret of success is showing up. Isi couldn't do that. He was hurt and missed the last 7 games of the season when the team finally turned itself around. It wasn't his fault, but it is what it was. I think it's crazy that the general consensus is good-riddance to Medina and losing Shradi is a tragedy. Both contributed, both were flawed.
That all makes sense but I vehemently disagree with Medina not playing with a lot of heart. IMO, he was the second hardest worker on the team (behind Taty).You make good points - I hated Medina but he brought things to the team that Shradi didn’t - team cohesion, defensive effort, playing within the team - but he also didn’t play with a lot of heart, seemingly had no bite in the tackle, didn’t perform at a level we would expect, and to me just wasn’t likeable.
Contrast that with Shradi who played with heart, cost less, scored some great goals and was just darn likeable.
I hate to say it but we may not have won this year without Medina who was arguably more valuable to the team. (Blech.)
Bottom line: I loved Shradi and sad to see him go but it’s no tragedy. I’m really glad to see Medina go and hopeful we’ll replace him with a high performing DP.
West ham makes a lot of sense given how much they rely on Antonio and Moyes probably appreciates how hard working he is. Is he good enough to score regularly in the Premier League? Maybe, but a bottom half PL team seems a little more likely to me - can he get a work permit?West Ham monitoring New York City striker Valentin Castellanos
The Argentine scored as New York City beat Portland Timbers on penalties to lift the MLS Cup last weekend, taking his tally for the season to 23 goals across all competitions.www.dailymail.co.uk
That all makes sense but I vehemently disagree with Medina not playing with a lot of heart. IMO, he was the second hardest worker on the team (behind Taty).
I say that but I am also glad to see Medina go, and the ability to fill that spot with a high performing DP.
Better to give Charlotte the $250K in GAM that was doled out to the losers in the Expansion Draft than bother with the draft itself.