By coincidence, or not, there was this tweet earlier today:
In common with the UK-NYCFC account is the "down to 3 candidates" part. But Sanchez claims they are 3 unknowns while UKNYCFC namechecks Van Bronckhorst.
AFAIK, nobody claimed there were 3 candidates left until today, when we hear it twice, in reports that otherwise contradict each other.
Either,
- the same person leaked to Sanchez and UK, but said substantially different things,
- the same person leaked to Sanchez and UK, but Sanchez never heard of GVB (extremely unlikely),
- Sanchez is the person who DMd the UK account and one of them embellished by adding GVB to the mix, or
- somebody read Sanchez's tweet, embellished with the GVB bit, and passed it on anonymously to the UK account (while adding a reference to the Outfield article on the stadium for a stadium news angle that adds nothing to SoupInNYC 's great reporting.
I think #4 is by far the most likely, and if I'm right, it means the report that there are 3 candidates and GVB is one of them is based on an unsourced rumor tweeted by a well-meaning fan, and then embellished by a Twitter rando with info relating to GVB that is in fact invented. GVB is the only name linked to us so adding his name to the "report" was an easy way to generate believable buzz and interest without actually knowing anything.
But no matter which of these scenarios is right (or some variant thereof) the report is, by admission of the person who tweeted it, based to an person unnamed
even to the UK account who spoke
at an unknown time. Which means that even if the anonymous unsourced report is 100% accurate (HA!), that NYCFC might have been down to 3 candidates several weeks ago, and maybe on the verge of a hire, until Arsenal started recruiting Arteta and that threw all our plans into static chaos while CFG made us wait out their priorities. Or we had 3 candidates several weeks ago and every single one rejected us. Or we had 3 candidates and Lee and Manchester can't come to an agreement as to who to hire.