Sands gone means Cacha time!
would you put acevedo with parks or morales with parks as your first pick pairing? this is assuming maxi resigns and plays the 10. otherwise, i would guess santi would be the #10.
Sands gone means Cacha time!
Right now I see...would you put acevedo with parks or morales with parks as your first pick pairing? this is assuming maxi resigns and plays the 10. otherwise, i would guess santi would be the #10.
Right now I see...
------Talles--Heber--Thiago---
--------------Santi--------------
--------Cacha--Parks----------
-Malte-Chanot-Callens-Gray-
------------Johnson------------
Again, that's what I see not what Ronny will put out.
Right now I see...
------Talles--Heber--Thiago---
--------------Santi--------------
--------Cacha--Parks----------
-Malte-Chanot-Callens-Gray-
------------Johnson------------
Again, that's what I see not what Ronny will put out.
I was admittedly down on Morales for the first half of the season but after the way, he played down the stretch I don't see how it is possible to justify playing Cacha over Morales. The version of Morales we saw at the end of the season and in the playoffs is better than Cacha at winning the ball, shielding the ball, and passing the ball. Until Cacha stops panic dribbling at people and losing the ball 2-3 times a game I'd much rather have Morales next to Parks.
We typically bend over backwards for our players. But why would we loan him?
Yea don’t count Zelalem and Haak outCacha is more similar to Parks than a more defensive-minded Morales or even Sands. I'd rather pair Morales with Parks in a preferred lineup but obviously we will see plenty of rotation there and likely all four combinations with those guys (and likely more with one additional player).
I also wouldn't count out a potential signing to vie for minutes there.Yea don’t count Zelalem and Haak out
I also wouldn't count out a potential signing to vie for minutes there.
On a single homegrown salaryThe funny thing is that we are going to need a CB, RB, and DM at bare minimum just to replace James Sands.
DP contract?? One year contract with a potential 2024 option. Kinda like it but it has to be TAM to like it. Official website (don’t know how up to date it is) says Designated Player still.
They referred to it as an extension and he was under a DP contract, but they make no mention of him continuing as a designated player. I'm confused. LOLDP contract?? One year contract with a potential 2024 option. Kinda like it but it has to be TAM to like it. Official website (don’t know how up to date it is) says Designated Player still.
The club has been killing it on the business/contract side lately.Abramowitz says it’s a non-DP contract